Like many auto repair professionals and enthusiasts, I’ve been on a quest for the perfect diagnostic scan tool. In my exploration, I spent considerable time with a Snap-On Verus, gaining a solid appreciation for its software capabilities. While the Verus unit I used showed its age with a less-than-responsive touchscreen, it opened my eyes to the potential of advanced scan tools. This experience led me to consider a Pc Based Obd2 Scan Tool, specifically the AutoEnginuity, believing that a computer-based system would offer unparalleled flexibility and customization. After all, with a PC-based tool, you have the freedom to choose your own hardware.
My foray into the world of PC based OBD2 scan tools with AutoEnginuity, however, was not as seamless as I had hoped. Right from the start, the tool presented connectivity issues. Despite acknowledging the problem and attempting to resolve it with a software update, AutoEnginuity’s support team couldn’t fully eliminate the frequent disconnects I experienced while working on vehicles. Furthermore, I struggled to effectively utilize the Functional Tests, or Actuators as AutoEnginuity termed them, a crucial feature for in-depth diagnostics.
Seeking a solution, I contacted their engineering department. They, too, were grappling with replicating the disconnection problem in their lab. In good faith, they provided me with a beta patch, hoping it would address the persistent connectivity issues. While the beta patch did improve the connection stability, it introduced new anomalies. I observed bizarre readings – erratic RPM values at idle, numerical data overflowing and wrapping around the screen, and unusually high Long Term Fuel Trim (LTFT) readings. Interestingly, the data logs recorded during these sessions appeared normal, contradicting the live display.
Despite diligently running tests and providing data files as requested, the issues persisted. My repeated requests for a Return Merchandise Authorization (RMA) were met with requests for more testing and data submission. Feeling like I had inadvertently become a beta tester rather than a customer, and with no resolution in sight, I eventually sought assistance from PayPal to return the AutoEnginuity scan tool for a refund.
Disappointed but undeterred, I shifted my focus back to handheld scan tools. I acquired a pre-owned Snap-on Solus Edge through eBay. While the purchase process itself had its complications (a story for another time), Snap-On’s exceptional customer service ultimately turned the experience around. My interaction with Snap-On, both in terms of their tool quality and their business practices, left a lasting positive impression.
The Solus Edge has proven to be an excellent diagnostic tool, exceeding my expectations. Its compact size, rapid 5-second boot-up time, DLC-powered operation, and user-friendly ShopStream Connect software for recording and reviewing data are significant advantages in a busy garage environment. Crucially, all Functional Tests, including the often-problematic ABS Brake Bleed for a 2007 Equinox, worked flawlessly. Interestingly, I did notice that our 2008 Mazda 3 seemed to have limited Functional Tests and only a single Emissions test available. Perhaps Mazda’s diagnostic interface is more restricted in this regard. I regret not having had the opportunity to compare it with the Verus during my time with that tool.
Ultimately, my experience highlighted a key difference between PC based OBD2 scan tools and their dedicated handheld counterparts. The convenience of a handheld scan tool, powered directly from the DLC port, is undeniable, especially when working in a garage setting. Fumbling with a laptop, finding a stable and visible placement within the vehicle while running diagnostics, and managing cables simply doesn’t compare to the streamlined workflow of a standalone handheld unit. For my day-to-day automotive diagnostic needs, the convenience and reliability of a handheld scan tool like the Snap-on Solus Edge are the clear winner.
