For those in the market for a versatile and stylish compact SUV, Mazda offers two compelling options: the ever-popular CX-5 and the newer, more rugged CX-50. While both models reside in the same vehicle class and share some fundamental DNA, they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. Understanding the nuances between the Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50 is crucial in making an informed decision. Let’s dive into a detailed comparison to help you determine which Mazda SUV best fits your lifestyle.
Size and Space Comparison: CX-5 vs CX-50
One of the primary distinctions between the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 lies in their dimensions and overall size. The Mazda CX-5, measuring 180 inches in length, positions itself on the more compact end of the spectrum within the compact SUV category. This makes the CX-5 exceptionally maneuverable in urban environments and easier to park. However, this smaller footprint translates to a slightly more snug interior, particularly in the rear seats. Passengers, especially taller adults, might find the rear legroom in the CX-5 a bit limited compared to roomier competitors like the Honda CR-V or Volkswagen Tiguan.
Recognizing the demand for increased space, Mazda engineered the CX-50 to be notably larger. Extending 6 inches longer than the CX-5, the CX-50 prioritizes passenger comfort and cargo capacity. While still classified as a compact SUV, the CX-50 offers a more generous cabin and a larger cargo area. Though it doesn’t quite match the expansive interiors of the CR-V or Tiguan, the CX-50 provides a more comfortable and practical space for both passengers and their belongings compared to the CX-5. If interior space is a top priority, the CX-50 holds a clear advantage in the Mazda lineup.
Performance and Engine Options: CX-5 and CX-50 Analyzed
When it comes to performance and engine choices, the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 initially present a similar picture. Both SUVs share the same powertrain options for the initial model years. The standard engine for both is a responsive 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, delivering 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. This engine provides adequate power for daily driving and commuting.
For drivers seeking a more exhilarating driving experience, both the CX-5 and CX-50 offer a turbocharged variant of the 2.5-liter engine. This turbocharged powerhouse significantly boosts performance, producing 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gasoline, and even more impressively, 256 hp and 320 lb-ft when fueled with 93 octane premium gasoline. Equipped with the turbo engine, both Mazda SUVs become surprisingly quick for their class, rivaling even some luxury compact SUVs in terms of acceleration and responsiveness.
However, the CX-50 distinguishes itself in the powertrain department with the introduction of a hybrid option starting with the 2025 model year. This Toyota-sourced hybrid system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, resulting in a combined output of 219 horsepower and 163 lb-ft of torque. The key advantage of the CX-50 Hybrid is its significantly enhanced fuel efficiency, achieving an EPA-estimated 38 mpg in combined driving. This makes it a far more fuel-conscious choice compared to both the standard (28 mpg combined) and turbocharged (25 mpg combined) engines available in both models. Crucially, a hybrid powertrain is not offered for the CX-5, giving the CX-50 a unique edge for eco-conscious buyers.
In conclusion, when considering the Mazda CX-5 vs CX-50, your choice will depend on your priorities. If you value compactness, maneuverability, and a slightly lower price point, the CX-5 remains a strong contender. However, if you prioritize interior space, a more rugged aesthetic, and the option of a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain, the CX-50 emerges as the more compelling choice. Both SUVs offer Mazda’s signature driving dynamics and stylish design, ensuring a rewarding ownership experience.
