The 2019 Toyota Camry Le stands out as a reliable and safe sedan, earning recognition for its robust safety features and commendable performance in crash tests. This article delves into a detailed safety evaluation of the 2019 Toyota Camry LE, drawing upon data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). As your trusted source at obd2global.com, we provide an expert breakdown to help you understand the safety aspects of this popular vehicle.
Small Overlap Frontal Crash Test: Driver-Side Assessment
The small overlap front crash test simulates a collision where only a small portion of the vehicle’s front end impacts an object. For the driver-side evaluation of the 2019 Toyota Camry LE, the results are highly encouraging.
Driver-Side Small Overlap Front: Impressive “Good” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE achieved a “Good” rating in the driver-side small overlap front test. This top rating signifies excellent protection for the driver in this challenging crash scenario.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Chest | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Hip/thigh | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Lower leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
The structural integrity of the 2019 Toyota Camry LE held up exceptionally well, earning a “Good” rating for structure and safety cage. Crucially, injury measures for the head, neck, chest, hip, thigh, lower leg, and foot were all rated “Good,” indicating minimal risk of significant injuries in a real-world crash of this type. Driver restraints and dummy kinematics also received a “Good” rating, reflecting the effectiveness of the seatbelts and airbags in controlling occupant movement during the impact.
Technical Measurements: Driver-Side Small Overlap Front
Detailed technical measurements from the driver-side small overlap test provide further insights into the vehicle’s performance.
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| Lower hinge pillar max | 2 |
| Footrest | 2 |
| Left toepan | 2 |
| Brake pedal | 2 |
| Parking brake | 4 |
| Rocker panel lateral average | 0 |
| Steering column | 0 |
| Upper hinge pillar max | 1 |
| Upper dash | 1 |
| Lower instrument panel | 2 |
These measurements reveal minimal intrusion into the occupant compartment, reinforcing the “Good” rating for structural integrity. Limited intrusion is crucial in maintaining survival space for the driver during a severe frontal collision.
Driver Injury Measures (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 157 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
| Neck Extension bending moment (Nm) | 4 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.14 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 22 |
| Femur – Left (kN) | 0.5 |
| Femur – Right (kN) | 0.3 |
| Knee displacement – Left (mm) | 0 |
| Knee displacement – Right (mm) | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Left (%) | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Right (%) | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index – Left | 0.35 |
| Maximum tibia index – Right | 0.42 |
| Tibia axial force – Left (kN) | 2.0 |
| Tibia axial force – Right (kN) | 0.9 |
| Foot acceleration – Left (g) | 59 |
| Foot acceleration – Right (g) | 34 |
The driver injury measures are remarkably low across the board. The Head Injury Criterion (HIC) score is well below critical levels, and there was no hard contact detected for the head. Neck forces are also minimal. Chest compression is low, and femur and tibia forces are significantly below injury thresholds. These measurements underscore the excellent protection offered by the 2019 Toyota Camry LE in a driver-side small overlap frontal crash.
Small Overlap Frontal Crash Test: Passenger-Side Assessment
Evaluating the passenger side in the small overlap front crash is equally important for overall vehicle safety. The 2019 Toyota Camry also underwent this rigorous test.
Passenger-Side Small Overlap Front: “Good” Overall Rating
Similar to the driver-side, the 2019 Toyota Camry achieved a “Good” overall rating in the passenger-side small overlap front test.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Passenger injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Passenger injury measures – Chest | Good (G) |
| Passenger injury measures – Hip/thigh | Good (G) |
| Passenger injury measures – Lower leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | Acceptable (A) |
| Driver injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Chest | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Hip/thigh | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Lower leg/foot | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
While passenger injury measures and structural performance were “Good,” the passenger restraints and dummy kinematics received an “Acceptable” rating. The IIHS noted that while the dummy’s face remained in contact with the frontal airbag, its head moved too far to the right, approaching the gap between the frontal and side curtain airbags. However, the side curtain airbag did deploy effectively, offering sufficient forward coverage. Driver injury measures remained “Good” across all categories in this test as well.
Action shot from the passenger-side small overlap frontal crash test, demonstrating the impact dynamics on the 2019 Toyota Camry LE.
Post-crash dummy position in the 2019 Toyota Camry LE passenger-side small overlap test, showing excellent maintenance of survival space.
Close-up view of the dummy’s head contact with the frontal airbag in the passenger-side small overlap test, indicating slight movement towards the gap in airbag coverage.
Leg and feet space for the passenger dummy after the small overlap frontal crash test, highlighting the low risk of lower extremity injuries in the 2019 Toyota Camry LE.
Technical Measurements: Passenger-Side Small Overlap Front
Detailed measurements for the passenger-side test provide further context.
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Passenger Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| Lower hinge pillar max | 4 |
| Footrest | 9 |
| Right toepan | 4 |
| Center toepan | 3 |
| Rocker panel lateral average | 1 |
| Center dash | 2 |
| Upper hinge pillar max | 3 |
| Upper dash | 4 |
| Right lower dash | 3 |
Intrusion measurements are slightly higher on the passenger side compared to the driver side, particularly at the footrest. However, the overall occupant space was still well-maintained.
Passenger Injury Measures (Passenger Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 189 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck Tension (kN) | 1.1 |
| Neck Extension bending moment (Nm) | 12 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.25 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 21 |
| Femur – Left (kN) | 0.9 |
| Femur – Right (kN) | 0.9 |
| Knee displacement – Left (mm) | 3 |
| Knee displacement – Right (mm) | 3 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Left (%) | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Right (%) | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index – Left | 0.27 |
| Maximum tibia index – Right | 0.33 |
| Tibia axial force – Left (kN) | 2.4 |
| Tibia axial force – Right (kN) | 1.9 |
| Foot acceleration – Left (g) | 44 |
| Foot acceleration – Right (g) | 53 |
Passenger injury measures remain low, similar to the driver side. HIC scores, neck forces, and chest compression are all within safe limits. Femur and tibia forces also indicate a low risk of leg injuries for the passenger.
Driver Injury Measures (Passenger Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 126 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
| Neck Extension bending moment (Nm) | 10 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.16 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 31 |
| Femur – Left (kN) | 0.6 |
| Femur – Right (kN) | 0.5 |
| Knee displacement – Left (mm) | 0 |
| Knee displacement – Right (mm) | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Left (%) | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk – Right (%) | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index – Left | 0.34 |
| Maximum tibia index – Right | 0.23 |
| Tibia axial force – Left (kN) | 1.2 |
| Tibia axial force – Right (kN) | 0.9 |
| Foot acceleration – Left (g) | 41 |
| Foot acceleration – Right (g) | 37 |
Driver injury measures on the passenger side test are consistently low, mirroring the protection levels seen in the driver-side test.
Moderate Overlap Frontal Crash Test: Original Assessment
The moderate overlap frontal test represents a more traditional frontal crash scenario, impacting a larger portion of the vehicle’s front.
Moderate Overlap Front: “Good” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE earned a “Good” rating in the moderate overlap frontal test.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Chest | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Leg/foot, left | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Leg/foot, right | Good (G) |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | Good (G) |
All evaluation criteria received “Good” ratings, demonstrating excellent performance in this type of frontal impact.
Technical Measurements: Moderate Overlap Front
Technical data further validates the “Good” rating.
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| Footrest | 5 |
| Left Footwell | 7 |
| Center Footwell | 6 |
| Right Footwell | 3 |
| Brake pedal | 3 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement – Left | 1 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement – Right | 1 |
| Steering column movement – Upward | -1 |
| Steering column movement – Rearward | -6 |
| A-pillar rearward movement | 1 |
Footwell intrusion measurements are slightly more pronounced than in the small overlap test, but still within acceptable limits. Steering column movement is well-controlled, moving rearward and upward away from the driver, which is beneficial in reducing injury risk.
Driver Injury Measures (Moderate Overlap Front)
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 204 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck Tension (kN) | 1.0 |
| Neck Extension bending moment (Nm) | 21 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.27 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 26 |
| Femur force – Left (kN) | 1.1 |
| Femur force – Right (kN) | 1.3 |
| Knee displacement – Left (mm) | 0 |
| Knee displacement – Right (mm) | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index – Left | 0.31 |
| Maximum tibia index – Right | 0.51 |
| Tibia axial force – Left (kN) | 2.5 |
| Tibia axial force – Right (kN) | 2.5 |
| Foot acceleration – Left (g) | 69 |
| Foot acceleration – Right (g) | 39 |
Injury measures remain low, consistent with the “Good” rating. Head, neck, and chest injury risks are minimal. Leg injury measures are also low, demonstrating comprehensive occupant protection.
Side Impact Crash Test: Original and Updated Assessments
Side-impact crashes pose a significant threat, and the 2019 Toyota Camry LE has been evaluated under both the original and updated IIHS side crash tests.
Side Impact: Original Test – “Good” Rating
In the original side impact test, the 2019 Toyota Camry LE achieved a “Good” overall rating.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
| Structure and safety cage | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Torso | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Pelvis/leg | Good (G) |
| Driver head protection | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures – Torso | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures – Pelvis/leg | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger head protection | Good (G) |
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE demonstrated “Good” performance across all metrics in the original side impact test, protecting both front and rear occupants effectively.
Side Impact: Updated Test – “Poor” Overall Rating
However, in the more stringent updated side impact test, the 2019 Toyota Camry LE received a “Poor” overall rating. This updated test uses a heavier barrier and higher impact speed to better reflect real-world side-impact scenarios, particularly involving larger vehicles.
| Evaluation criteria | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall evaluation | Poor (P) |
| Structure and safety cage | Acceptable (A) |
| Driver injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Driver injury measures – Torso | Marginal (M) |
| Driver injury measures – Pelvis | Marginal (M) |
| Driver head protection | Marginal (M) |
| Rear passenger injury measures – Head/neck | Good (G) |
| Rear passenger injury measures – Torso | Acceptable (A) |
| Rear passenger injury measures – Pelvis | Poor (P) |
| Rear passenger head protection | Good (G) |
While head and neck protection for both driver and rear passenger remained “Good,” torso and pelvis protection for the driver were rated “Marginal,” and pelvis protection for the rear passenger was “Poor.” Driver head protection was also “Marginal” due to the dummy’s head striking the window sill after moving past the side curtain airbag.
Post-crash view of the 2019 Toyota Camry LE after the updated side crash test, showing the impact zone and vehicle deformation.
Damage to the occupant compartment of the 2019 Toyota Camry LE after the updated side crash test, with doors removed to show airbag deployment and structural deformation.
Grease paint on the window sill indicates head contact for the driver dummy in the updated side crash test, highlighting a limitation in head protection.
Grease paint on the rear passenger dummy’s head shows effective protection by the side airbags in the updated side crash test.
Technical Measurements: Updated Side Impact Test
Technical measurements from the updated side impact test reveal areas of concern.
Occupant Compartment Intrusion (Driver Side) – Updated Side Impact
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement (cm) |
|---|---|
| B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver’s seat | -15.5 |
The B-pillar intrusion measurement indicates substantial deformation into the occupant space.
Driver Injury Measures – Updated Side Impact
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 391 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | 82 |
| Neck Tension (kN) | 1.8 |
| Neck Compression (kN) | 0.2 |
| Shoulder Lateral deflection (mm) | 47 |
| Shoulder Lateral force (kN) | 1.5 |
| Torso Maximum deflection (mm) | 41 |
| Torso Average deflection (mm) | 39 |
| Torso Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 3.61 |
| Torso Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.68 |
| Pelvis Combined force (kN) | 5.7 |
HIC scores for the head are elevated in the updated side impact test. Torso deflection and viscous criterion are also higher, contributing to the “Marginal” torso injury rating. Pelvis forces are significant, resulting in a “Marginal” pelvis injury rating for the driver and “Poor” for the rear passenger.
Passenger Injury Measures – Updated Side Impact
| Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 168 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck Tension (kN) | 0.4 |
| Neck Compression (kN) | 0.4 |
| Shoulder Lateral deflection (mm) | 25 |
| Shoulder Lateral force (kN) | 1.3 |
| Torso Maximum deflection (mm) | 32 |
| Torso Average deflection (mm) | 29 |
| Torso Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.57 |
| Torso Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.37 |
| Pelvis Combined force (kN) | 6.1 |
Rear passenger pelvis forces are higher than driver pelvis forces in the updated side impact test, leading to the “Poor” rating for rear passenger pelvis protection.
Roof Strength Test
Roof strength is crucial for rollover protection.
Roof Strength: “Good” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE achieved a “Good” rating in the roof strength test.
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
|---|---|
| Curb weight | 3,326 lbs |
| Peak force | 18,862 lbs |
| Strength-to-weight ratio | 5.67 |
A strength-to-weight ratio of 5.67 indicates that the roof can withstand over 5 times the vehicle’s weight before significant crush, providing good protection in rollover accidents.
Head Restraints & Seats
Head restraints and seats play a vital role in preventing whiplash injuries in rear-end collisions.
Head Restraints & Seats: “Good” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE’s head restraints and seats earned a “Good” overall rating.
| Overall evaluation | Good (G) |
|---|---|
| Dynamic rating | Good (G) |
| Seat/head restraint geometry | Good (G) |
The dynamic rating and seat/head restraint geometry are both rated “Good,” indicating effective design for whiplash protection.
Technical Measurements: Head Restraints & Seats
| Seat type | Power cloth seat |
|---|---|
| Backset (mm) | 20 |
| Distance below top of head (mm) | 6 |
| Max T1 acceleration (g) | 13.8 |
| Head contact time (ms) | 63 |
| Force rating | 1 |
| Max neck shear force (N) | 0 |
| Max neck tension (N) | 281 |
These measurements show favorable geometry and dynamic performance, contributing to the “Good” rating.
Headlights
Headlight performance is critical for nighttime driving safety. The 2019 Toyota Camry LE has different headlight options with varying ratings.
Headlight Ratings: Trim Level Variations
The headlight ratings for the 2019 Toyota Camry LE vary depending on the trim level and headlight package.
Hybrid XLE trim with Adaptive Headlights package: “Good” overall rating.
XLE, XSE, XLE V6, XSE V6, Hybrid XLE trims: “Acceptable” overall rating.
LE, SE, L, Hybrid LE, Hybrid SE trims: “Acceptable” overall rating (for 2018-20 models).
The adaptive LED projector headlights available on the Hybrid XLE trim with the Adaptive Headlights package provide the best performance, earning a “Good” rating. Other trims with LED projector headlights achieve an “Acceptable” rating.
Front Crash Prevention: Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Front crash prevention systems are essential for mitigating or avoiding frontal collisions.
Vehicle-to-Vehicle Front Crash Prevention: “Superior” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE, equipped with the standard Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection, earned a “Superior” rating for vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention.
| Overall evaluation | Superior |
|---|---|
| Forward Collision Warning | Meets requirements |
| 12 mph test | Collision Avoided |
| 25 mph test | Collision Avoided |
The system successfully avoided collisions in both 12 mph and 25 mph tests, demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing vehicle-to-vehicle crashes.
Front Crash Prevention: Pedestrian (Day)
Pedestrian detection systems are increasingly important for urban safety.
Pedestrian Front Crash Prevention (Day): “Advanced” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE’s standard Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection earned an “Advanced” rating for pedestrian front crash prevention in daytime conditions.
| Overall evaluation | Advanced |
|---|---|
| Crossing child – 12 mph test | Impact speed reduced by 6 mph |
| Crossing child – 25 mph test | Impact speed reduced by 6 mph |
| Crossing adult – 12 mph test | Collision Avoided |
| Crossing adult – 25 mph test | Collision Avoided |
| Parallel adult – 25 mph test | Collision Avoided |
| Parallel adult – 37 mph test | Impact speed reduced by 15 mph |
The system avoided collisions with crossing adults at both 12 mph and 25 mph, and with a parallel adult at 25 mph. It also significantly reduced impact speed in other pedestrian scenarios, indicating effective pedestrian front crash prevention capabilities.
Child Seat Anchors (LATCH)
Child seat anchor ease of use is important for proper child restraint installation.
Child Seat Anchors (LATCH): “Good +” Rating
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE received a “Good +” rating for child seat anchors (LATCH), indicating good usability and extra LATCH positions.
| Overall evaluation | Good + extra LATCH positions |
|---|---|
| Vehicle trim | LE |
| Seat type | cloth |
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE has two rear seating positions with complete LATCH hardware and an additional position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors, providing flexibility for child seat installation.
Conclusion: 2019 Toyota Camry LE – A Safe and Reliable Choice
The 2019 Toyota Camry LE demonstrates strong safety performance across various crash tests and safety system evaluations. It achieves “Good” ratings in key areas like small overlap frontal (driver and passenger side), moderate overlap frontal, roof strength, and head restraints & seats. While it received a “Poor” rating in the updated side impact test, its performance in the original side impact test was “Good,” and it excels in front crash prevention and LATCH ease of use.
For those prioritizing safety in a midsize sedan, the 2019 Toyota Camry LE remains a compelling option, offering a blend of robust crashworthiness and advanced safety technologies. As always, for the most up-to-date and detailed safety information, refer to official sources like the IIHS and NHTSA.
