For car enthusiasts in regions with varied climates, the debate between rear-wheel drive (RWD) and all-wheel drive (AWD) performance sedans is a familiar one. When considering a blend of practicality and exhilarating driving dynamics, models like the 2007 Audi RS4 and the BMW E90 M3 often top the list. Both offer high-revving engines, sedan practicality, and the option of a manual transmission, but cater to different preferences and driving styles.
Initially drawn to the appeal of Audi’s Quattro all-wheel-drive system for enhanced traction in diverse conditions, the 2007 Rs4, also known as the B7 RS4, presents a compelling package. Its naturally aspirated 4.2-liter V8 engine is a masterpiece, delivering potent performance and a distinctive soundtrack. The RS4’s design, especially with European market options like unique seats and a Lamborghini-inspired steering wheel, remains visually striking even today. The allure of a rare and well-designed AWD sedan is undeniable.
However, deeper research into the 2007 Audi RS4 reveals potential ownership concerns. Carbon buildup within the engine is a known issue across all RS4 models, potentially impacting performance and requiring costly maintenance. Furthermore, the Dynamic Ride Control (DRC) suspension system, while intended to enhance handling, is also prone to issues and can be expensive to repair or replace. While the Quattro system provides уверенность on the road, particularly in less-than-ideal conditions, it doesn’t necessarily translate to superior handling dynamics in all situations.
Driving impressions of the B7 RS4 often highlight a tendency towards understeer, a characteristic noted by automotive publications and experienced during spirited driving. Despite its planted feel, the RS4’s chassis may not offer the sharpest cornering capabilities compared to its RWD counterparts. This is exemplified by performance comparisons, where the RS4 has been observed lapping significantly slower than the Audi R8, which shares a similar 4.2-liter V8 engine but benefits from a more dynamically focused chassis. This highlights a potential mismatch between the engine’s capabilities and the chassis’s ultimate handling prowess.
In contrast, the BMW E90 M3 emerges as a superior dry-weather performer and a more dynamically engaging sports sedan overall. Opting for the E90 M3, with its naturally aspirated V8 and six-speed manual transmission, prioritizes driver engagement and handling purity. The M3’s chassis is renowned for its balance and responsiveness, offering a more rewarding experience for enthusiasts who value precise cornering and track capability. While fuel economy may be a concern, the driving experience is consistently praised, with comfortable seats, an intuitive iDrive system, and a highly responsive engine. Some drivers even find the engine response so immediate that they utilize the power button to modulate throttle sensitivity for daily driving.
Choosing between the 2007 Audi RS4 and the BMW E90 M3 ultimately depends on individual priorities. The RS4 offers the appeal of AWD and distinctive styling but comes with potential maintenance concerns and a less agile chassis. The E90 M3, while sacrificing AWD, delivers a more focused and rewarding driving experience, particularly for those prioritizing handling and driver engagement in dry conditions. For enthusiasts seeking the pinnacle of RWD sports sedan performance, the BMW E90 M3 represents a compelling choice.
