Once upon a time, the Autotap Obd2 Software and scanner was a go-to tool for automotive enthusiasts and DIY mechanics. It was known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, especially for GM vehicles, but it offered valuable insights for a wide range of makes and models post-1995. For many years, the company provided excellent customer service, solidifying its reputation in the OBD2 scanning market. However, the landscape of automotive diagnostics has shifted, leading to the decline of AutoTap and similar software-based scan tools. Let’s explore the key reasons behind this change.
Several factors contributed to the reduced demand for dedicated software like AutoTap OBD2, despite its past strengths.
Firstly, free DTC code scanning services became widely available. Auto parts retailers like AutoZone offer complimentary diagnostic scans and even clear trouble codes. For the average car owner, facing an illuminated check engine light, this free service is often sufficient. Why invest in software when a quick trip to the local parts store provides a no-cost solution for basic diagnostics?
Secondly, the market saw an influx of inexpensive, basic OBD2 code readers. These devices, available as handheld units or smartphone apps paired with Bluetooth OBD2 adapters, can be purchased for under $20. These tools perform essentially the same fundamental function as AutoTap for basic code reading and clearing. The convenience and affordability of these options made dedicated software less appealing to budget-conscious consumers.
Thirdly, advanced engine tuning software packages began incorporating their own robust scan tools. Products like HP Tuners, designed for performance tuning and PCM modifications, include comprehensive scanning capabilities as part of their suite. While some users, like the original author, found AutoTap superior to the scan tools included with early tuning packages, the gap narrowed over time. For serious automotive enthusiasts already invested in tuning software, the need for a separate scanning tool like AutoTap diminished.
In conclusion, while AutoTap OBD2 software was a valuable tool in its prime, the evolution of the automotive diagnostic market made it less relevant. Free services, cheaper alternatives, and feature-rich tuning software eroded the demand for standalone OBD2 software like AutoTap. While it remains a reliable tool for those who own it, its era as a leading solution has passed.
’05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26
’95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes
’98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30
3.4″ pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails
KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18″ EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers
EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch
^^^ SOLD ^^^
’70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles
^^^ SOLD ^^^
